Following up on that:
Exploring the neurobiology of politics, scientists have found that liberals tolerate ambiguity and conflict better than conservatives because ... their brains work.Well, OK. The ellipses should read 'of how.' But, still.
Arkadyevitchizing America since 2006
By the time you panic, it is way too late -- Lee Raymond, New York Times, July 6, 2008
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies a theft from those who are hungry and not fed; from those who are cold and not clothed. This world-in-arms is not spending money alone; it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D Eisenhower, 11/16/53
Exploring the neurobiology of politics, scientists have found that liberals tolerate ambiguity and conflict better than conservatives because ... their brains work.Well, OK. The ellipses should read 'of how.' But, still.
1 comment:
Yes, for some odd reason, philosophical musings tend to turn people off. I suspect this is a more American trait.
I've suspected recently that conservativism versus liberalism is really a continuum on a scale representing the time required to incorporate new information into a revised world view.
This, of course, says nothing about the quality of the information, so conservativism can actually be useful.
However, this does explain why people tend to get more consevative as they get older. It's simply a manifestation of the calcification of their brains, rather than a reflection of any particular acquired wisdom.
Nice systems and feedback view though. More in future musings?
Post a Comment